Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joe Quong et al. v. United States, 1962 — 371 U.S. 863 · caselaw · US
General
Joe Quong et al. v. United States
371 U.S. 863·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 285.
Joe Quong et al. v. United States.
Melvin B. Lewis for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A.
6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.