General
Connor v. Cochran, Corrections Director; Whitley v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction; Coulton v. Sacks, Warden; and Shaw v. New Jersey
364 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 22,
Misc.
Connor v. Cochran, Corrections Director; Whitley v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction; Coulton v. Sacks, Warden; and Shaw v. New Jersey.
No. 38,
Misc.
No. 120,
Misc.
No. 228,
Misc.
Petitioners pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 22, Mise. C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and James O’C. Gentry, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 38, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
Motions for leave to file petitions for 'writs of habeas corpus denied. Treating the papers submitted as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.