Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary A. Denike, Respondent, v. Abraham Denike et al., Appellants, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 585 · caselaw · US
General
Mary A. Denike, Respondent, v. Abraham Denike et al., Appellants
167 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary A. Denike, Respondent, v. Abraham Denike et al., Appellants.
(Argued May 6, 1901;
decided May 21, 1901.)
Denike v. Denike, 44 App. Div. 621, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 12, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Raphael J. Moses and Mirabeau L. Towns for appellants.
Henry J. Morris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Pareer, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.