General
Jacob London et al., Appellants, v. Wilbur F. Martin et al., Respondents
149 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob London et al., Appellants, v. Wilbur F. Martin et al., Respondents.
London v. Martin, 79 Hun, 229, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 15, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
Emanuel J. Myers for appellants.
Paul C. Cloyd, Arthur M. King and William J. Underwood for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.