Contracts · MBE-tested
SKELLY OIL CO. v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.
73 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SKELLY OIL CO. v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.
No. 3781.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 4, 1934.
Arthur G. Logan, of Wilmington, Del., Dean S. Edmonds and Charles W. Riley, both of New York City, W. P. Z. German, of Tulsa, Old., Marvel Morford, Ward & Logan, of Wilmington, Del., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, for appellant.
Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., William F. Hall and Charles M. Thomas, both of Washington, D. G., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — DAVIS, Circuit Judge.]
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Upon consideration of the motion of dgfcndant-appellant for order granting District Court leave to consider an application to reopen proofs and after hearing arguments of counsel thereon, it is ordered that the said motion be, and the same is hereby, denied.