Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In Re Louis D. GLANZ, Bankrupt. Louis D. GLANZ v. UNITED AMERICAN TRUST & SAVINGS BANK et al., 1933 — 67 F.2d 994 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In Re Louis D. GLANZ, Bankrupt. Louis D. GLANZ v. UNITED AMERICAN TRUST & SAVINGS BANK et al.
67 F.2d 994·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In Re Louis D. GLANZ, Bankrupt. Louis D. GLANZ v. UNITED AMERICAN TRUST & SAVINGS BANK et al.
No. 4929.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1933.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1934.
Jacob Levy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Frank Michels, of Chicago, III., for appellee United American Trust & Savings Bank.
Frank D. Mayer, of Chicago, 111., for appellee Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co.
Before EVANS, FITZHENRY, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to he heard from the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the order of decree of the said District Court in this cause appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs.