General
John J. Delahanty, Plaintiff in Error, v. William T. Pitkin et al.
199 U.S. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 26.
John J. Delahanty, Plaintiff in Error, v. William T. Pitkin et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut.
Argued October 27, 1905.
Decided October 30, 1905.
Mr. Lewis E. Stanton and Mr. Sidney E. Clarke for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles E. Perkins and Mr. Wm. Waldo Hyde for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Giles v. Teasley, 193 U. S. 146; Remington Paper Company v. Watson, 173 U. S. 443; Smalley v. Laugenour, 196 U. S. 93; Wabash Railroad Company v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29. Case below, 76 Connecticut, 412.