Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank & J. G. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant, v. The John Good Cordage and Machine Company, Defendant. Berthold A. Reiss, Claiming to be Receiver of The John Good Cordage and Machine Company et al., Respondents, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 679 · caselaw · US
General
Frank & J. G. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant, v. The John Good Cordage and Machine Company, Defendant. Berthold A. Reiss, Claiming to be Receiver of The John Good Cordage and Machine Company et al., Respondents
168 N.Y. 679·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank & J. G. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant, v. The John Good Cordage and Machine Company, Defendant. Berthold A. Reiss, Claiming to be Receiver of The John Good Cordage and Machine Company et al., Respondents.
Jenkins v. John Good Oordage & M. Go., 56 App. Div. 573, affirmed.
(Argued November 13, 1901;
decided December 3, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 31, 1900, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint as to all the defendants except the John Good Cordage and Machine Company by the court on trial at Special Term.
Benjmnin K. Cardozo and Ira Leo Bamberger for appellant.
Leopold Wdllach, Max J. Kohler and Alfred A. Coolc for Berthold A. Reiss, as receiver, etc., respondent.
Edward A. Hibbard for Edwin A. McAlpin et al., respondents.
Henry G. Willeox for American Surety Company, respondent.
Abel Groolc for James J. Phelan, respondent.
Henry Hoyt and Christian G. Moritz for James Rorke, respondent.
Waldo G. Morse for General Fire Extinguisher Company, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ. '