Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alaska Commercial Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. George H. Melse et al., 1907 — 207 U.S. 583 · caselaw · US
General
Alaska Commercial Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. George H. Melse et al.
207 U.S. 583·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 55.
Alaska Commercial Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. George H. Melse et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Argued November 14, 1907.
Decided December 2, 1907.
Mr. William H. Gorham for plaintiffs "in error.' Mr. Corwin S. Shank and Mr. John C. Higgins for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs. Gold Washing and Water Company v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199; Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company v. Dixon, 179 U. S. 134; Kansas City Suburban Belt Railway Company v. Herman, 187 U. S. 63; Alabama Great Southern Railway Company v. Thompson, 200 U. S. 206; Morris v. Gilmer, 129 U. S. 328; Offner v. Railroad Company, 148 Fed. Rep. 201; Knuth v. Railway Company, 148 Fed.,Rep. 3.