Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
South Carolina ex rel. South Carolina Public Service Commission v. United States et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 944 · caselaw · US
General
South Carolina ex rel. South Carolina Public Service Commission v. United States et al.
351 U.S. 944·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 28, 1956.
No. 794.
South Carolina ex rel. South Carolina Public Service Commission v. United States et al.
T. C. Callison, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Irvine F. Belser for appellant. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and Leo H. Pou for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, James B. Mc-Donough, Jr., Richard B. Gwathmey, James A. Bistline and Charles P. Reynolds for the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.