Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harry L. Burgoyne, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. Patrick E. McKillip et al., 1911 — 220 U.S. 604 · caselaw · US
General
Harry L. Burgoyne, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. Patrick E. McKillip et al.
220 U.S. 604·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 828.
Harry L. Burgoyne, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. Patrick E. McKillip et al.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm and petition for certiorari submitted April 3, 1911.
Decided April 17, 1911.
Mr. C. C. Flansburg and Mr. Robert Ramsey for the appellants and petitioners.
Mr. Francis A. Brogan for the appellees and respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589. Petition for a writ of certiorari denied.