General
Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley, Commissioner, et al.
308 U.S. 508·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 201.
Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley, Commissioner, et al.
October 9, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
The appe'al is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1025 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ' of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.
Mr. Terrell Marshall for petitioner. Mr. W. L. Pope for respondents.