Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. et al., 1960 — 361 U.S. 943 · caselaw · US
General
National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. et al.
361 U.S. 943·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 559.
National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. et al.
Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner.. Milton C. Denbo, Leland Hazard, and Joseph T. Owens for Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., and Samuel L. Rothbard and Abraham L. Friedman for United Glass & Ceramic - Workers of North America respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.