General
Ruth Holmes, Appellant, v. Frank Jones, Respondent
170 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ruth Holmes, Appellant, v. Frank Jones, Respondent.
Holmes v. Jones, 37 App. Div, 626, affirmed.
(Argued January 27, 1902;
decided February 11, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 3, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
John J. Healey, Jr., for appellant.
George R. Salisbury for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.