Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The National Bank of Fort Edward, Respondent, v. Washington County National Bank, Appellant, 1878 — 72 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
The National Bank of Fort Edward, Respondent, v. Washington County National Bank, Appellant
72 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The National Bank of Fort Edward, Respondent, v. Washington County National Bank, Appellant.
(Submitted January 28) 1878;
decided February 5, 1878.)
Reported below, 5 Hun, 605.
Boies & Thomas for appellant.
A. D. Wait for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal on authority of Coe v. Hobby, ante, p. 141; Pennie v. Life Ins. Co. (67 N. Y., 278); King v. Galvin (62 id., 238).
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.