Corporations

RALPH OTT, Appellant, v. PACKARD-BELL COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents

106 Cal. App. 2d 831236 P.2d 205·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1951·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

236 P.2d 205] [Civ. No. 18415. Second Dist., Div. Two. Oct. 15, 1951.] RALPH OTT, Appellant, v. PACKARD-BELL COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents. Elmer H. V. Hoffman and Charles H. Carr for Appellant. Todd W. Johnson, Donald C. McGovern and Edward D. Robertson for Respondents. [MAJORITY — McCOMB, J.] McCOMB, J. It has been stipulated that the decision in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, No. 18411 (ante, p. 770 [236 P.2d 201]), shall be controlling in the above-entitled case. Since we have this day filed a decision affirming the judgment in Marshall v. Packard-Bell, it is ordered that the judgment in the instant case be affirmed. Moore, P. J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied November 1,1951, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied December 13, 1951.