General
WALTHAM WATCH CO. v. KEENE
209 F. 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALTHAM WATCH CO. v. KEENE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 18, 1913.)
No. 67.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by the Waltham Watch Company against Charles A. Keene. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
For opinion below, see 202 Fed. 225.
Crawford, Harris & Goodwin, of New York City (William G. Thompson, Nathan Matthews, Romney Spring, and George E. Mears, all of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellant.
A. H. Rosenfeld, of New York City, for appellee.
Before WARD and ROGERS; Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The decree of the court below is affirmed.