Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Elmira, Cortland and Northern Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Seymour Lowman, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles G. Judd, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 534 · caselaw · US
General
The Elmira, Cortland and Northern Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Seymour Lowman, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles G. Judd, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
179 N.Y. 534·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Elmira, Cortland and Northern Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Seymour Lowman, as Administrator of the Estate of Charles G. Judd, Deceased, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Elmira. C. c6.A. R. R. Co. v. Lowman, 76 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Argued June 9, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 2, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
E. J. Baldwin for appellant.
Frederick Collin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affinnéd, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: IIaigiit, J.