Contracts · MBE-tested
PARA RUBBER CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PERRY et al.
279 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1922
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PARA RUBBER CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PERRY et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 7, 1922.)
No. 2855.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Charles P. Orr, Judge. Suit in equity by Harry W. Perry and others, trustees of Herman M. Comins, bankrupt, against the Para Rubber Company of Pennsylvania. From an order granting an injunction and appointing a receiver, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Leonard K. Guiler, E. Lowry Humes, and D. S. Horne, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant. Lowrie C. Barton and Lewis M. Alpern, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.
Certiorari denied 257 U. S. —, 42 Sup. Ct. 589, 66 L. Ed. —.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After argument, and on due consideration had, the order o: the court below of December 27, 1921, granting an injunction and appointing a receiver, is x-eversed, with costs, and it is directed that the mandate be sent down forthwith.