Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ruth A. Johnstone, Appellant, v. Eugene F. O'Connor, Respondent, 1899 — 161 N.Y. 619 · caselaw · US
General
Ruth A. Johnstone, Appellant, v. Eugene F. O'Connor, Respondent
161 N.Y. 619·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ruth A. Johnstone, Appellant, v. Eugene F. O’Connor, Respondent.
Reported below, 21 App. Div. 77.
(Submitted November 20, 1899;
decided November 28, 1899.)
Motion to advance on the calendar an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 17, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the ground that the speedy hearing of the appeal is essential to the preservation of appellant’s rights, should the Court of Appeals decide in her favor.
John L. Hill for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, without costs.