Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC et al., 1961 — 364 U.S. 628 · caselaw · US
General
WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC et al.
364 U.S. 628·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC et al.
No. 515.
Decided January 9, 1961.
Benedict T. Mangano for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Roy Wiedersum and Gilbert M. Landy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.