General
Thomas M. King et al., Appellants, v. Reon Barnes, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
113 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas M. King et al., Appellants, v. Reon Barnes, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
(Argued April 16, 1889;
decided May 3, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made February 11, 1889, which denied a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order providing for the talcing of oral testimony in contempt proceedings before a referee.
William W. Mac Farland for appellants.
William B. Hornblower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.