Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; California v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; and Southern California Edison Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al., 1966 — 383 U.S. 955 · caselaw · US
General
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; California v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; and Southern California Edison Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.
383 U.S. 955·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 28, 1966.
No. 79.
No. 82.
No. 596.
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; California v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.; and Southern California Edison Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. et al.
Gregory A. Harrison and Atherton Phleger on the motion for appellee El Paso Natural Gas Co. William M. Bennett, H. B. Jones, Jr., Rollin E. Woodbury, Harry W. Sturges, Jr., and William E. Marx on the motion for appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. Utah. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 382 U. S. 970.) Motion of appellee, El Paso Natural Gas Co., to strike portions of the designation of record, and motion of appellants to strike the cross-designation of record, denied without prejudice to the further order of this Court as to costs.