Veronica Petrulla, Also Known as Veronica Zvirblis, Appellant, v. Elsa Broslin, as Administratrix, etc., of John Broslin, Deceased, Appellant; Richmond County Building and Mutual Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. Elsa Broslin, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., of John Broslin, Deceased, Appellant. In the Matter of the Petition of Veronica Petrulla, General Guardian of the Person and Property of Veronica Zvirblis, Appellant, to Revoke Letters of Administration of Elsa Broslin, upon the Estate of John Broslin, Deceased, for an Accounting and for Other Relief. Paul D. Seigel, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of John Broslin, Deceased, Respondent

Veronica Petrulla, Also Known as Veronica Zvirblis, Appellant, v. Elsa Broslin, as Administratrix, etc., of John Broslin, Deceased, Appellant. Richmond County Building and Mutual Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. Elsa Broslin, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., of John Broslin, Deceased, Appellant. In the Matter of the Petition of Veronica Petrulla, General Guardian of the Person and Property of Veronica Zvirblis, Appellant, to Revoke Letters of Administration of Elsa Broslin, upon the Estate of John Broslin, Deceased, for an Accounting and for Other Relief. Paul D. Seigel, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of John Broslin, Deceased, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion of Seigel as temporary administrator to be relieved from the terms of the stipulation dated June 7, 1932, denied, without costs, with leave to renew the motion if there be further unnecessary delay. In view of our decision of February 23,1934 [ante, p. 700], in this same matter, wherein the Richmond County Building and Mutual Loan Association sought to be relieved from the terms of the same stipulation, we think it is necessary that the respondent remain bound as a party so that the matter may be closed without further delay. We appreciate the embarrassment and impatience that the respondent must feel because of the delay that has occurred through no fault of his own. If the Richmond County Building and Mutual Loan Association fails to act promptly as directed by the decision of February 23,1934, and the order entered thereon, and cause any further unnecessary delay, the respondent may have leave to renew his application or proceed otherwise as he may be advised. Any party interested may move to stay proceedings in the Surrogate’s Court if it appear that the funds in the custody of the temporary administrator are to be disposed of in any manner contrary to that contemplated by the judgment to be entered in the Supreme Court as provided in the stipulation. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.