General
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v. James R. Gould et al., Defendants, and Reitha E. Barsky, Defendant-Appellant and Respondent
268 A.D. 995·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(December 11, 1944.)
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v. James R. Gould et al., Defendants, and Reitha E. Barsky, Defendant-Appellant and Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
In a foreclosure action, defendant Barsky appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) which allowed and fixed a deficiency of $1,361.10, while plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the order and judgment as modifies the report of an official referee by reducing the deficiency from $2,361.10 to $1,361.10. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.