Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., 2018 — 139 S. Ct. 360 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al.
139 S. Ct. 360202 L. Ed. 2d 258·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al.
No. 18A375.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 9, 2018.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,
IT IS ORDERED that the orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 3, 2018, August 17, 2018, and September 21, 2018, are stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before October 11, 2018, by 4 p.m., and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.