Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc., Respondent, v. Harold J. Geiger et al., Appellants
236 A.D.2d 878653 N.Y.S.2d 890·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1997·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis W. King Petroleum Products, Inc., Respondent, v Harold J. Geiger et al., Appellants.
[653 NYS2d 890]
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges the necessary elements of a cause of action under article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Prometheus Books v Russica Book & Art Shop, 105 AD2d 1138, 1140; Loblaw, Inc. v Wylie, 50 AD2d 4, 7) and alleges fraud in sufficient detail to satisfy the requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Moore Adv. Agency v Shapiro, 124 AD2d 696). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J.—Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.