Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry G. Strubbe, Appellant, v. The Kings County Trust Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1902 — 169 N.Y. 603 · caselaw · US
General
Henry G. Strubbe, Appellant, v. The Kings County Trust Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
169 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry G. Strubbe, Appellant, v. The Kings County Trust Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
Strubbe v. Kings County Trust Co., 60 App. Div 548, affirmed.
(Argued January 6, 1902;
decided January 21, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 17,1901, affirming a judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
H. M. Whitehead for appellant.
George V Brower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with coats; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.