General

Carlos Roman, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent

187 A.D.2d 390·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1992·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Carlos Roman, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent. [MAJORITY] Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about February 11, 1992, which ruled certain hospital records to be admissible in evidence, unanimously dismissed, without costs. No appeal as of right lies from an order that merely rules on the admissibility of evidence during a trial (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]). Rather, such rulings are to be reviewed on appeal from the judgment after trial (Kopstein v City of New York, 87 AD2d 547). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and we do not address the merits of the rulings. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.