General
Samuel Bronstein et al. v. United States
18 Cust. Ct. 447·United States Customs Court·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Bronstein et al. v. United States
No. 6978.
Entry No. 75, etc.
Invoices dated Bradford, England, April 23, 1941, etc.
Entered at St. Louis, Mo., July 25,1941, etc.
(Decided March 7, 1947)
Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins of counsel) for the plaintiffs.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Olivee, Presiding Judge:]
Olivee, Presiding Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
(Stipulation omitted.)
On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised*, values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.