Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York as to the Opening of One Hundred and Sixty-third Street from Tenth Avenue to Edgecombe Road, 1892 — 131 N.Y. 569 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York as to the Opening of One Hundred and Sixty-third Street from Tenth Avenue to Edgecombe Road
131 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York as to the Opening of One Hundred and Sixty-third Street from Tenth Avenue to Edgecombe Road.
(Argued January 20, 1892;
decided February 2, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made October 9, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term, opening a default herein and requiring the commissioners of estimate and assessment to receive and act upon the claim of Martin B. Brown for compensation for land taken.
David J. Dean for appellant.
James A. Deering for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur, except Maynaed, J., taking no part.
Appeal dismissed.