Contracts · MBE-tested
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission
392 U.S. 909·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1329.
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
Rollin E. Wood-bury, Harry W. Sturges, Jr., William E. Marx, and William R. Connole for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff, Robert L. Russell, and Israel Convisser for respondent.
James W. McCartney for Transwestern Pipeline Co., intervenor below, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.