IP
In the Matter of the Application of Leon LILIENFELD
3 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Leon LILIENFELD.
(Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Submitted January 14, 1925.
Decided March 2, 1925.)
No. 1701.
F. F. Church, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from a Patent Office decision refusing to allow six claims of appellant’s application for a patent. Having carefully examined the record, in the light of appellant’s argument and brief, and finding no error therein, we are content to rest our decision upon the views expressed by the tribunals of the Patent Office. The decision therefore is affirmed.