Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis J. Tobias, Appellant, v. John P. Wierck et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
Francis J. Tobias, Appellant, v. John P. Wierck et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis J. Tobias, Appellant, v. John P. Wierck et al., Respondents.
Tobias v. Wierck, 80 App. Div. 486, affirmed.
(Submitted May 23, 1900;
decided June 5, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 10, 1898, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury, and granting a new trial.
George Welwood Murray and Allen W. Jobison for appellant.
Henry J). Hotchkiss and R. B. Aldcroftt, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendants on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Landon and Werner, JJ.