Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHARLESTON v. JESSUP, 1873 — 154 U.S. 592 · caselaw · US
General
CHARLESTON v. JESSUP
154 U.S. 59238 L. Ed. 1089·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHARLESTON v. JESSUP.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 234.
Argued February 14, 1873.
Decided March 31, 1873.
Tomlinson v. Jessups 15 Wall. 4:54, followed.
Mr. D. T. Corbin for appellants.
Mr. I. G. Barker for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Field]
Mr. Justice Field
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is governed by the decision in Tomlinson and others, appellants, against the same defendant, 15 Wall. 454. Upon the authority of that decision the decree must be reversed, and the cause be remanded to the court below With directions to dismiss the suit; and it is so ordered. Reversed.