Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mid-Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 893 · caselaw · US
General
Mid-Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
382 U.S. 893·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 204.
Mid-Florida Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Paul Dobin for petitioner.
Edward P. Morgan and Edward S. O’Neill for WORZ, Inc., respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion to use the record in No. 698, October Term, 1963, granted. Motion to direct the Federal Communications Commission and the Solicitor General to file a statement of their position denied. Certiorari denied.