Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Robert Gere Bank, Appellant, v. Horace Inman, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1889 — 115 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
The Robert Gere Bank, Appellant, v. Horace Inman, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
115 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Robert Gere Bank, Appellant, v. Horace Inman, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued June 18, 1889;
decided June 28, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme • Court in the fourth judicial department, made January 19, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term, denying a motion to strike out as sham the answer of the defendant Duncan.
Martin A. Knapp for appellant.
P. J. Lewis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
Order affirmed.