General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Sherman D. Pilsbury, Deceased. Edwin M. Pilsbury et al., Appellants; Lena M. Pilsbury et al., Respondents
186 N.Y. 545·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Sherman D. Pilsbury, Deceased. Edwin M. Pilsbury et al., Appellants; Lena M. Pilsbury et al., Respondents.
Matter of Pilsbury, 113 App. Div. 893, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1906;
decided October 23, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 8, 1906, which affirmed a decree of the Albany. County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate and construing the will of Sherman D. Pilsbnry, deceased.
James B. Bowen for appellants.
William E. Woodard for Lena M. Pilsbury, respondent.
Martin T. Bfachtmann for Jessie I. P. Foil, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs to each respondent appearing separately by counsel and arguing or filing briefs.; no opinion.
Concur : Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., and Willard Bartlett, J.