General
Herman C. Boedicker, Appellant, v. The Sackett & Wilhelms Company, Respondent
168 A.D. 885·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
First Department,
April, 1915.
Herman C. Boedicker, Appellant, v. The Sackett & Wilhelms Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of March, 1915, granting leave to serve supplemental answer.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from is modified by imposing as a condition of permitting the defendant to serve a supplementary answer, that he pay a trial fee of thirty dollars and ten dollars costs of opposing motion; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.