Contracts · MBE-tested
Arlington Frocks, Inc., Respondent, v. Elizabeth Waldburger and Ernest R. J. Waldburger, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Waldburger & Huber, Appellants
256 A.D. 919·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arlington Frocks, Inc., Respondent, v. Elizabeth Waldburger and Ernest R. J. Waldburger, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Waldburger & Huber, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order so far as appealed from unanimously modified by granting items 9, 10,11,13 and 15 of the notice of motion, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. As to item 9, plaintiff need state only the approximate dates. As to item 10, plaintiff need not furnish particulars in respect to plaintiff’s contracts with customers. Bill of particulars to be served within ten days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.