Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Millard, Respondent, v. The Holland Trust Company, Appellant, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Millard, Respondent, v. The Holland Trust Company, Appellant
157 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Millard, Respondent, v. The Holland Trust Company, Appellant.
Millard v. Holland Trust Go., 90 Hun, 607, affirmed.
(Argued October 5, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 4, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James L. Bishop for appellant.
L. laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Pette for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gray and Martin, JJ., not voting.