General
Billy J. BRITTON v. STATE of Arkansas
314 Ark. 220861 S.W.2d 114·Arkansas Supreme Court·1993·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Billy J. BRITTON v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 93-832
861 S.W.2d 114
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 20, 1993
Kearney Law Office, by: John L. Kearney, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Billy J. Britton, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.
However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Billy J. Britton will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.