General
George Mendes v. Caristo Construction Corp. et al. Artistic Bronze Tablet Co., Inc.
6 A.D.2d 673·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1958·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Mendes v. Caristo Construction Corp. et al. Artistic Bronze Tablet Co., Inc.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend the opinion of the court to read that the modification is “upon the law” and not upon the “law and facts” denied. The opinion will, however, be clarified to the extent of adding the words “and against the weight of the evidence” immediately following the language “we would have found the verdict was excessive” in that portion of the opinion dealing with our views on the excessiveness of the verdict. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.