Securities

Harrison J. Smith, Jr., Respondent, v. James Snipe, as President of Security Unit Employees, Counsel 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Appellant

112 A.D.2d 691·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1985·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Harrison J. Smith, Jr., Respondent, v James Snipe, as President of Security Unit Employees, Counsel 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Appellant. [MAJORITY] Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in affirming the order of Special Term which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action?” Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.