General

BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES; SAME v. SAME

216 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1910

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 124, 125. Argued March 4, 1910. Decided March 14, 1910. Rehearing granted in cases in which judgments were affirmed by divided court and cases restored to docket. Case below, 159 Fed. Rep. 33. Mr. Edward Colston, Mr. Judson Harmon, Mr. A. If. Goldsmith, and Mr. George Hoadley for the plaintiff in error. The, Solicitor General and The Attorney General for the do-' fondant- in error. Judgments affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. April 4, 1910. Rehearing granted, and cases restored to the docket for réargument and assigned to be heaf/i on the first Tuesday of the next term (October 11) after--the cases already assigned for that day.