General
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. GOOD SPRINGS ANCHOR COMPANY and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Defendants in Error
32 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. GOOD SPRINGS ANCHOR COMPANY and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Defendants in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 27, 1929.
No. 5422.
Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and Emmett E. Doherty, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.
Claude I. Parker and Ralph W. Smith, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants in error.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Reversed on authority of United States v. John Barth Co. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 49 S. Ct. 366, 73 L. Ed.-, decided by the Supreme Court May 13, 1929.