Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. George W. Poillon et al., Respondents, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
General
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. George W. Poillon et al., Respondents
121 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Appellant, v. George W. Poillon et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 25, 1890;
decided May 9, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 2,1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying an application by plaintiff for an order for leave to sue to be granted mmo fro tono as of a date before the commencement of the action.
Flamen B. Candler for appellant.
JEL~em.ry H. Mam, and Wellesley W. Cage for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.