Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bill SCHUETTE, Attorney General of Michigan, petitioner, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al., 2013 — 570 U.S. 947 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bill SCHUETTE, Attorney General of Michigan, petitioner, v. COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.
570 U.S. 947186 L. Ed. 2d 961·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bill SCHUETTE, Attorney General of Michigan, petitioner,
v.
COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.
No. 12-682.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 01, 2013.
Motion of respondents for divided argument granted, and the time is to be divided as follows: 15 minutes for respondents Chase Cantrell, et al. and 15 minutes for respondents Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.
[MAJORITY — Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.]
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.