General
Dorothy E. Jackson, Administratrix (Estate of Raymond E. Jackson), et al. v. I. David Marder
16 Conn. App. 805·Connecticut Appellate Court·1988·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dorothy E. Jackson, Administratrix (Estate of Raymond E. Jackson), et al. v. I. David Marder
(6574)
Borden, Daly and Foti, Js.
Submitted on briefs September 20
decision released October 11, 1988
Otto P. Witt filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).
Robert J. Cathcart filed a brief for the appellee (defendant).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
We have fully reviewed the claims of error as presented by the plaintiff, and the defendant’s responses thereto. This review persuades us that the trial court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.
There is no error.