Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP; SAME v. JENKINS, 1933 — 62 F.2d 1047 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP; SAME v. JENKINS
62 F.2d 1047·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP. SAME v. JENKINS.
Nos. 7047, 7046.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 27, 1933.
Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors’ claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino’s Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.